Posts Tagged ‘sexism’

Lets Accept All Views, Except Those We Won’t

February 19, 2010 1 comment

Oh Really?

Why don’t we ever seriously look at the racist viewpoint? Seriously, lets allow the skinheads, the Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan their say in the history books. Let’s allow the bigots their chance to help us understand what they are feeling.

Whats that? You don’t think that would be OK? Well, surprise surprise. The fact is we as a society (and really the world at the moment) are not even considering the possibility of any racist/sexist/bigoted comments to be heard. In classrooms, in the work place, in churches and even families. Everywhere you turn, views that express opinions of dissent toward one race are not allow an audience. But why is this?

After all, in today’s day and age, we are an accepting society. You can have any religion, any personal opinions, any political association, any family structure, anything at all that you want. And with the first amendment, you can voice these beliefs for all the world to hear, providing you aren’t a hate monger. But, why is that?

With liberal ideals running rampant proclaiming that we should all say what we think is right, and that no one person can say THEY are right, whats wrong with some racism? After all, there are many people who argue that one race is inferior to another. Even Charles Darwin in his Origin of Species said very clearly he thought this was true (it’s in the title people: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life).

So why won’t we allow these disfavored ideas to come to light? Because we as a society, no, as a world have decided that such things are wrong and shouldn’t be taught or discussed. Oh don’t get me wrong, we talk about racism, but have you ever heard of a racist described for their good traits, or their contributions as individuals? How about an in-classroom discussion on the merits of Hitler’s opinions on the Jews? What of the slave owners who gave shelter to their slaves, and that treated them like children? No, these are never discussed.

Now don’t get me wrong, I certainly don’t believe these things are good. Racism (in my opinion) was because of mistrust, and misunderstanding of different cultures which manifested itself in the form of slavery and persecution. With that being said, can I say I know the ins and outs of the situation? No. I am deeply aware of the mindset of the Jews during world war 2 because of all the anti-Nazism that’s spread throughout society, but I have no idea about the potential reasons behind Hitler’s SS (besides the ever present “they were evil/insane” argument).

So what’s the point I am trying to make with all this? Well, it’s that truth is relative. Let me explain myself before you guys start to look for my address: if enough people believe in something, that then becomes “truth” as it were.

Let me give you an example: if I said 2+2=5, that would be wrong. However, if the vast majority of the people on the planet believed whole-heartedly that 2+2=5, then it wouldn’t matter if I was correct, everyone else says I’m not. If I spoke out with that belief, it would shunned and not given any attention. By de facto I would be wrong. In the same way, people in the south during the 1850’s wouldn’t ever consider hearing the possibility that black people should be considered equal. Another example would be if the Nazis had won, do you really think the holocaust would be considered an atrocity? No! It would have been equated with something along the lines of a Holy Cleansing.

See how the truth can be subject to perspective? That’s the point I am trying to make. I will say it again, I am NOT a

What Will It Hold?

racist, or a sexist or a bigot of any kind. All I am attempting to get across to you is the concept that not only could you be wrong on your perspective of issues in the world, but the world itself could be wrong.

Let me leave you with this: we look back and see that the church burning “witches” during early America was wrong, that slavery was abhorred and that the nazis’ view was despicable. But consider this, what will out great-grandchildren look back and say we got completely wrong?

-Trenton Stahl

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.


Men’s Rights: Where Are They?

April 10, 2009 3 comments

Those that are close to me would say that I am a very opinionated person. There are a few things I have taken a rather strong stance on (PS3 vs. 360, Pluto being a planet, dairitarianism, etc.) but none of those come close to the vigor I put in my arguments for Men’s rights. Let me be clear about this to begin, I am not a sexist. I grew up in a house with 4 sisters and a mom. I don’t carry any negative feelings towards them, but I do believe that living that way has given me a slightly different perspective on the problem than most others.

Before I launch into my rant, let me give a little background on the subject:

The feminist movement started in 1790, when a woman named Mary Wollstonecraft stated in a pamphlet the inequalities in society (Britain) and that they should be equalized. This, I wholeheartedly agree with and endorse. All I want in society is equality and fairness regardless of gender. This was the core principal the feminist movement strived for, unfortunately it has strayed from its path. Up until 1967, the movement was about woman demanding (as they rightfully deserved) equal pay, and non-discriminatory laws giving them a footing in the modern world. This was good. However, soon we start to see a shift in motives. In 1968, feminists start to use the phrase “Sisterhood is Powerful”. According to my research, this is a corner stone to a more hostile attitude that is now know to be associated with feminists.

In 1969 a group called Redstockings was formed with the purpose of “Holding the view that all men oppress all women as a class and that it is the responsibility of individual men to give up male supremacy, rather than the responsibility of women to change themselves.” Yeah, their a bit nutsy. They are known as one of the more radical groups to date, as they staged many illegal, disruptive, and annoying protests with the goal of converting men and women to their cause. They are still around, but operate more in the background with legal matters.

At this point in time, we are in the third wave of feminism. From what I have seen and experienced, the third wave of feminism is sexist. The things feminists now hope to achieve (although they will never admit it) is greater rights for women, than men.

Which leads me to my argument, Men’s Rights. Very few of you have probably even heard of the concept, because society loves to paint the woman of the country as the victims rather than a class of people looking for equality. A good example¬†of obviously blinding¬†sexism is court cases involving rape. In most states if a woman says she was raped, she does not have to provide any physical evidence from her body. This is usually achieved by claiming the event was severely emotionally traumatizing, and that she doesn’t want to be examined. With a convincing lawyer, this can be achieved. However it should be noted that in cases of jail time over 10 years/the death sentence the woman is almost always pressured to get examined.

Another example of the court’s sexism is custody battles. Where a couple is divorcing and children are involved, women get the children in almost 70% of cases. Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against the mother taking care of children. I simply believe that the children should go to the parent who can give them the best opportunity possible for success in life, and I don’t believe that 70% of mothers make more money, and are as loving as fathers are. But in this area of issue, my real concern is that feminism is nowhere to be found! If feminists were out to really get what they claim “Equal Rights under the law” than they would also fight against blatantly obvious showings of sexism, regardless of the circumstances.

Also, how often have you heard of a police officer responding to a scene of domestic disturbance, and had a couple quarreling? Many times domestic violence is insinuated, but if it is made by the man saying the woman did it, it is many times defeated in trial, or never goes at all. Feminists groups don’t fight this at all!

Seeing how long this is running I’ll try to wrap it up with this last point.

I would not have an issue with these blatantly hypocritical showings of feminism, if it weren’t for the fact that most Men’s Rights groups are not taken seriously, and are many times ignored. This goes back to the faulty assumption that women are victims. They are not! They are a group of citizens that want to be given equal footing in society, and should be seen as such.

Here is my statement to all feminists. If you want equal treatment, you should. If you want equal rights, fine. If you want to be recognized as people and not sex-objects, that’s just dandy. All we men want in return is for you to STOP BEING HYPOCRITICAL! If your stance on a subject is equal rights, then don’t try and get more than men. If you want to be taken seriously, take a hint from Martin Luther King Jr.: make it clear what you want, fight for it, and when you get it, be content!

Stop the Stupidity!

-Trenton Stahl

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.